Coalition Forms to Support Voter Approved Cannabis Act

Don’t just go ahead and change what the people voted for and say it was enacted by the people when there wasn’t a vote – Respect the vote…right?

Michigan’s cannabis system was created deliberately by voters who chose to end prohibition, establish a regulated marketplace, and protect individual rights through the Michigan Regulation and Taxation of Marihuana Act. The MRTMA reflects years of public discussion and careful policy design intended to balance access, regulation, and accountability.

In recent weeks, a broad and diverse group of important cannabis stakeholders in Michigan, have begun coming together in response to proposed legislation that would impose license caps and population-based limits on the adult-use market. These proposals would mark a significant departure from the structure voters approved and have prompted concern among stakeholders who do not often find themselves aligned.

This emerging coalition is not defined by a single business interest or political viewpoint. It includes advocates, civil liberties voices, small business owners, community leaders, professionals, policy experts, and regulated market participants. Some have been involved in cannabis reform efforts for decades. Others entered the regulated system more recently, relying on the expectation that Michigan’s voter-approved system for cannabis would be respected and allowed to function as intended.

What unites this group is not resistance to change, but a shared belief that major policy shifts should be approached carefully, transparently, and with full consideration of available alternatives. License caps would fundamentally alter how Michigan’s adult-use system operates, despite limited evidence that such caps will address pricing pressures or market imbalance. At the same time, regulatory tools already built into the MRTMA have not yet been fully explored.

There are early signs that the prospect of license caps is already producing unintended effects. Public data and legislative statements suggest that some applicants are pursuing multiple licenses in anticipation of a potential moratorium, without intent to operate them. This speculative behavior risks distorting the market and undermining long-term stability.

Equally important is the process by which these proposals have advanced. Discussions have moved quickly, often with limited notice and participation, leaving many affected stakeholders without an opportunity to engage before significant policy direction was set. This dynamic has reinforced the need for broader, more inclusive dialogue.

The purpose of this coalition is constructive and straightforward. It exists to support solutions that remain grounded in voter intent, informed by data, and developed through open collaboration. Rather than rushing toward sweeping statutory changes, the coalition believes Michigan should first make full use of the framework voters approved and the regulatory tools already available.

At this stage, the coalition remains informal and intentionally so. Its focus is on identifying common ground, understanding the full range of impacts associated with proposed changes, and ensuring that Michigan’s cannabis policy continues to reflect voter intent and sound governance. As the conversation develops, others who share these values and concerns may find common cause in this effort. The goal is not rapid expansion, but thoughtful engagement grounded in experience, evidence, and respect for the system voters approved.

CANNRA Briefing on Trump EO changing cannabis to Schedule III – December 18 2025

Michigan Cannabis Tax Distribution